A little while ago, I blogged about the Food Printer, a revolution in the food industry that could change the way we think about food. With millions of people around the world struggling just to eat, it seems pretty important to access all our food options and discover new ways of feeding people. Today, I bring to you another revolution in the food industry in the form of Synthetic Meat.
Synthetic Meat is meat that never had a pulse. Also known as ‘in vitro meat’, this meat is grown in a lab. The process first involves a precursor, such as stem cells, which initiate the growth of animal muscle cells. These precursors are placed on a scaffold in a liquid medium. Eventually, muscle cells begin to grow and divide, spreading themselves out as a sheet of meat. Delicious!
One of the main driving force for the design of synthetic meat is simple: supply and demand. With populations around the world soaring, there is a growing demand for meat. And as more nations progress from developing to developed, the demand is even greater. Earth has only so much land to grow crops to feed livestock and for those livestock to graze, so synthetic meat was created from a purely logistical standpoint.
But there are other benefits. Current meat production contributes 15-24% of the world’s greenhouse gases. And unlike what you might hear, this is mainly due to deforestation and not to the flatulence of cows. Growing livestock isn’t exactly an energy efficient process. For every 1 kg of poultry, pork or beef, 2kg, 4kg and 7kg of grain is required, respectively. So you can imagine just how much land needs to be cleared just to grow enough livestock feed. By making meat in a lab, you save a lot of water and a lot of natural resources. (You can read more about meat’s environmental contribution here)
There’s also the standpoint of animal activists. For quite some time, PETA has been ofering a $1million reward to a person or group that can make synthetic meat a reality. This would certainly leverage animal lovers in the vegetarian debate, where you no longer have to slaughter animals to satisfy your carnivorous cravings.
The technology to produce synthetic meat isn’t perfect though. Currently, there are some difficulties in guaranteeing the appropriate nutritional content, along with synthesising meat on a commercial scale. Nevertheless, researchers anticipate that within 6months, the first sausages will be synthesized and in a year, the first burger patties.
But will anybody buy these synthetic snags or products called ‘I can’t believe it’s not bacon’? Well that’s up to consumers. Some people think consumers just won’t go for synthetic meat. Their reasoning is that consumers just won’t like the idea of something so mechanical and lifeless (sort of like the vampires in True Blood not really wanting the synthetic, bottled blood). But the following video, which shows how commercial sausages are made, is just one reason why I think consumers will acclimatise to the change. It’s up to you to decide just how much ‘real meat’ is in these snags and just how healthy they really are.
So there you have it, synthetic meat. Of course, while synthetic meat aims to solve many global problems like overuse of natural resources, one can’t help but think that eating less meat would also do the trick. After all, overconsumption of meat has been linked to cancer and cardiovascular disease so it seems in everyone’s best interest to pick up a stick of celery every now and then. Please write comments and let us know what you think of synthetic meat and if you would eat a synthetic snag.

Also check out this video of the synthetic meat dilemma. It’s only two minutes long and is largely cartoon based so its like…watchable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO9q_paCcWA
I think it’s a great idea and can see it becoming the norm once it’s eventually rolled out in supermarkets. If they manage to make it cheaper and just as tasty as ‘real’ meat then I can’t see why people wouldn’t accept it, unless of course they’re against all those bad ‘chemicals’ which they will presume are rife in the synthetic meat.
There would actually be a real and big difference between organic food and non-organic food.
I’d eat a synthetic snag! Perhaps we could also regulate the carcinogenic properties of meat this way too?
Regardless, we have to do this in order to stop over-grazing and destruction of ecosystems to make way for agricultural systems. There’s no way people are going to give up meat (be it real, synthesised, or otherwise). In fact, as developing countries prosper, their per-capita protein intake through animal consumption is very much increasing – that’s reality.
One can only hope that our society, which is (in my opinion) becoming increasingly techno-phobic in many respects, will accept this. In the end though, I think the most important thing is that it ends up being cheaper ($$$!) than ‘real’ meat. If it’s not cost-competitive, it’ll simply end up like “organic” produce now – i.e. servicing a niche market that only a few buy into.
Also, eating ferals is a good idea too – plenty of protein available from them, and what better way to help keep invasive animal populations under control?
Haha! If I’d been more organized I would’ve written this article. Anyway, I’m all for cultured meat if it really does use less resources and has the right nutritional value. The only downside I can think of is for the snobs who want their 5 star tenderloins or whatever, but the technology will probably eventually exceed the real thing anyway
All I’m thinking about right now is being able to eat all those high fat meats but the fat free versions!